Tally's Beer UniverseThe Brewery Archive
← Tally's Take

Tally's Take · The Archive

The Law That Shaped Your Beer

Every beer you have ever been handed was the strength the law allowed, in the container the law allowed, sold by someone the law allowed to sell it, to someone the law allowed to buy it. The archive's law layer holds 84 acts, ordinances and decrees across 39 jurisdictions, and every one answers one of four questions.

Computed from the export at build · laws carry their own sources and grades · no law here is linked to a brewery yet, and the page says why

51

Who may brew

Licences, permits, zoning — the paper that stands between a kettle and a sale.

LICENSING · ZONING · EVENT_AUTHORIZATION

4

Who may drink

Prohibitions, and the older, quieter laws that said which people a beer could be sold to.

PROHIBITION · TIED_HOUSE

4

How, where and how strong

Container sizes, strength ceilings, taprooms, growlers, who may carry it to a shop.

DISTRIBUTION · LABELLING

11

What it costs

Excise, concessions, price controls — the state's share of every pint.

EXCISE

14 more are typed OTHER — price controls, a rice-milling decree, a Cabildo petition — and appear in the ledger below.

How strong, in one state

Alabama is the archive's worked example, because an Alabama master carried the whole arc. Until 2009 no beer sold in the state could be stronger than 6%; the Gourmet Beer Bill raised the ceiling to 13.9% after what the record calls a five-year grassroots campaign. Until 2012 no container could hold more than 16 ounces. Taprooms were illegal until 2011. Home brewing was illegal until 2013. A brewery could not sell you a growler until 2016 — 288 ounces a day, raised to 864 in 2021 — and the 1992 act that first allowed a brewpub at all required a historic building, an eighty-seat restaurant, no more than 10,000 barrels and no sales off the premises. Birmingham's Magic City Brewery opened under those conditions in March 1995 and closed in 2000.

That is why a state with breweries in the 1880s had, by the archive's count, none brewing in the 1980s. The law is the reason, and the law is dated. Oklahoma's version is one line on a record page: Prairie Artisan Ales was founded in a state that capped grocery-store beer at 3.2% until 2018, “which makes founding an imperial stout brewery there an act of some optimism.”

Alabama's arc, as recorded

  1. 1992 Alabama Brewpub Act

    Opened a legal path for brewpubs, but required historic building/site, <=10,000 barrels/year, an 80-seat restaurant and on-premises-only sales of house beer.

  2. 2009 Gourmet Beer Bill

    Raised the legal beer ABV ceiling from 6% to 13.9% after a five-year grassroots campaign.

  3. 2011 Brewery Modernization Act

    Legalized brewery taprooms in Alabama.

  4. 2012 Gourmet Bottle Bill

    Raised permitted retail beer container size from 16 oz to 25.4 oz.

  5. 2013 Homebrew Legalization

    Legalized limited home production of beer and related fermented beverages for personal use under the statute.

  6. 2016 Growler Bill / direct brewery sales

    Allowed qualifying breweries/brewpubs to sell up to 288 oz per customer per day for off-premise consumption; removed historic-area limits on brewpub locations.

  7. 2021 Expanded direct-sales limits & contract-brewing clarification

    Increased qualifying brewery off-premise limit to 864 oz per customer per day and clarified contract-brewing / alternating-proprietorship treatment.

  8. 2026 Alabama Small Craft Alcoholic Beverages Act

    Renames/expands the brewpub framework; creates small craft distillery, small craft winery and hybrid craft alcoholic beverage complex licensing; authorizes tours/tastings, limited public-event sales and manufacturer storage extensions under specified conditions.

Who may drink

The oldest laws in the layer are not about strength. They are about people. On 13 June 1836 the Council of Assiniboia, governing the Red River Settlement, prohibited the sale of beer to Indigenous people and set a twenty-shilling penalty — the record grades itself C, a minute cited at one remove. A century and a quarter later, in 1957, Fiji's governor announced an amendment “to allow beer drinking to all races”, and Pacific Islands Monthlydescribed 3 February 1958 as Suva's first day of beer without permits for Fijian and Indian men. Two laws, two records, and the whole colonial history of who was trusted with a glass sits between them.

The archive's three PROHIBITION laws are the small ones — Vermont's 1852 act lives in the events layer instead — and Dumped in the Street is the Take that reads the closures they caused.

Who may brew

Guatemala's layer starts with a 1729 petition to the Cabildo to make beer — which, the record is careful to say, does not prove any beer was made — and reaches 1885 with an exclusive privilege for industrial brewing on imported German equipment. San Marino's decree of 23 May 1871 required the same permission of anyone starting to manufacture pasta, beer, soft drinks or spirits, which tells you how the republic ranked them. The Northwest Territories' 1993 regulations set a $500 permit fee; Massachusetts keeps two licences apart, one to make and one to pour; New Brunswick removed its in-house brewery licence category on 1 April 2026; Alaska rewrote Title 4 in 2022. Forty-seven of the 84are licensing — the law's favourite question is still “who said you could?”

What it costs

Sweden's reduced excise for independent breweries under three million litres took effect on 1 July 2025, a month after farm and direct producer sales were allowed under municipal permit — the two laws that make a taproom economy possible, arriving in Sweden in the same summer. Barbados and Kiribati carry excise acts; Dominica, three fiscal-incentive concessions. The strangest cost law in the archive is not an excise at all: Japan's Imperial Decree No. 789 of 1939 restricted rice milling across the South Seas mandate, and the Palau branch government issued beer price-control notices from 1939 to 1941 — wartime rationing, reaching a brewery in Koror through the price of a bottle.

The ledger — every law, by jurisdiction

Title, date and type as the master recorded them, with the record's own line on what it does. The grade is the archive's: A is the statute or gazette itself, C a secondary summary, D unsourced.

Alabama · 8

  • 1992 Alabama Brewpub Act (Act No. 92-535)LICENSING · C

    Opened a legal path for brewpubs, but required historic building/site, <=10,000 barrels/year, an 80-seat restaurant and on-premises-only sales of house beer.

  • 2009 Gourmet Beer Bill (Act No. 2009-771)LICENSING · C

    Raised the legal beer ABV ceiling from 6% to 13.9% after a five-year grassroots campaign.

  • 2011 Brewery Modernization Act (Act No. 2011-630)LICENSING · C

    Legalized brewery taprooms in Alabama.

  • 2012 Gourmet Bottle Bill (Act No. 2012-468)LICENSING · C

    Raised permitted retail beer container size from 16 oz to 25.4 oz.

  • 2013 Homebrew Legalization (Act No. 2013-204)LICENSING · C

    Legalized limited home production of beer and related fermented beverages for personal use under the statute.

  • 2016 Growler Bill / direct brewery sales (Act No. 2016-97)LICENSING · C

    Allowed qualifying breweries/brewpubs to sell up to 288 oz per customer per day for off-premise consumption; removed historic-area limits on brewpub locations.

  • 2021 Expanded direct-sales limits & contract-brewing clarification (Act No. 2021-454)LICENSING · C

    Increased qualifying brewery off-premise limit to 864 oz per customer per day and clarified contract-brewing / alternating-proprietorship treatment.

  • 2026 Alabama Small Craft Alcoholic Beverages Act — enacted, not yet effective as of Pass 18 (HB593 / enacted Apr. 16, 2026; effective Oct. 1, 2026)EVENT_AUTHORIZATION · C

    Renames/expands the brewpub framework; creates small craft distillery, small craft winery and hybrid craft alcoholic beverage complex licensing; authorizes tours/tastings, limited public-event sales and manufacturer storage extensions under specified conditions.

Guatemala · 5

  • 1729 First documented Cabildo request to produce beerOTHER · B

    Historical reporting says the first known request to the Cabildo for permission to produce beer dates to 1729.

    Does not prove: The source does not identify a proven production entity or show that production actually occurred.

  • 1825 Authorization for manufacture and sale of beer and ciderEVENT_AUTHORIZATION · B

    Secondary historical sources state the government formally permitted beer/cider manufacture and sale in 1825; Guillermo Reichenberg received the first documented manufacturing license.

    Does not prove: A license or legal authorization alone does not prove that a specific licensed party actually produced beer.

  • 1854 Beer licensing expansion under Rafael CarreraLICENSING · B

    Historical reporting states beer was again addressed in legislation and more sale licenses/estancos were authorized.

    Does not prove: Licenses and estancos may represent sellers rather than breweries.

  • 1880 Beer-license expansionLICENSING · B

    Prensa Libre reports more than 180 beer-related licenses existed by about 1880 as production and trade expanded.

    Does not prove: The 180+ licenses must not be interpreted as 180 breweries.

  • 1885 Exclusive privilege for industrial beer production using imported German technologyTIED_HOUSE · B

    Prensa Libre historical reporting states the government granted the Castillo brothers an exclusive privilege in 1885 tied to industrial beer production with imported German technology.

    Does not prove: The privilege does not erase or disprove other small/rudimentary brewers or earlier licensed producers.

Kiribati · 5

  • 1999 Environment Act 1999 – prescribed developmentsLICENSING · A

    Brewing, making and distillery works are listed among prescribed food-industry developments.

  • 2013 Excise Tax Act 2013EXCISE · A

    Registered manufacturers of excisable goods may manufacture and sell only from licensed premises.

  • 2025 Liquor Act 2025LICENSING · A

    Official ministry page currently lists the Liquor Act 2025 and Liquor Application 2026.

  • undated Manufacturing-liquor licensing responsibilityLICENSING · A

    Ministry of Internal Affairs states it is responsible for Licensing of Manufacturing Liquor and Liquor Licensing.

  • undated Online Business Registry transition / re-registrationLICENSING · A

    New Online Business Registry is live; legacy business names and companies must re-register by 31 March 2027 or be removed from the register.

Northwest Territories · 4

  • undated NWT Manufacturing Licence + Manufacturer's Retail Outlet LicenceLICENSING · D

    2026 public database lists NWT Brewing Company Ltd. Class ML and MROL. Licence 2026-ML-66 explicitly authorizes beer manufacture at 3905 Franklin Avenue from 2026-03-31 through 2027-03-31.

  • undated Brewery Regulations R-005-93LICENSING · D

    Made 1993-02-09. Established brewery-permit application/renewal process, production/sales reporting requirements and $500 issue/renewal fees.

  • undated Liquor Regulations amendment R-027-93LICENSING · D

    Made 1993-05-11. An off-premises beer licence required the applicant to have applied for or hold a brewery permit.

  • undated Historical Liquor Act — brewery corporate disclosure and >10% share-transfer approvalLICENSING · C

    For corporate brewery-permit applicants the Board could require particulars of directors, officers and shareholders. For corporate permit holders, a share issue/transfer resulting in >10% beneficial voting control required Board approval before becoming final.

Yap State · 4

  • undated YSC Title 30, Chapter 3 §§301, 303DISTRIBUTION · B

    Yap's code requires a license to sell alcoholic beverages and lists wholesale, retail on-sale, retail off-sale, special-event and special off-hours classes.

    Does not prove: Does not prove which license class Stone Money or Manta Ray Bay currently holds; no license-register evidence was found in this pass.

  • undated YSC Title 22 Ch.1 §§101, 104, 106LICENSING · B

    Yap has a Business License Board; applications/renewals are processed through the Treasurer. This is part of the required record trail for a brewery business operating in Yap.

    Does not prove: Does not prove Stone Money's business-license holder name, license category, or current license status.

  • undated YSC Title 30 Ch.2 §§207, 210LICENSING · B

    Yap's Alcoholic Beverage Control Board approves/disapproves applications sent through the Treasurer, who issues an approved alcoholic-beverage license.

    Does not prove: Does not prove which person/entity holds the license for Stone Money/Manta Ray Bay or what license classes are held.

  • undated 11 YSC §808LICENSING · B

    The online code provides for an annual drinking permit for persons 21+ and exempts visitors staying no more than 30 days; licensed sellers/employees are exempt while acting within duties.

    Does not prove: Does not establish current 2026 enforcement practice or whether later amendments changed the permit system.

Chuuk State · 3

  • 2001 Chuuk State Law No. 6-01-16 (Act No. 6-15) §§9, 14, 17LICENSING · A

    The enacted law gives the Chuuk Alcoholic Beverage Control Board power to license manufacture, requires a license to import/manufacture/sell alcoholic beverages, and requires license records to be open to public examination. The Chuuk law index dates approval to December 4, 2001 and identifies Act No. 6-15. HB 18-34 remains listed in progress in 2026 to amend Section 3.

    Does not prove: No manufacturer licensee is established by the statute or index. HB 18-34's title alone does not reveal its effect and does not prove enactment.

  • 2026 HB 18-34LICENSING · A

    The current Chuuk Legislature lists HB 18-34 as legislation in progress with the title 'To amend section 3 of Chuuk State Law No. 6-01-16,' the alcohol-control statute that also contains manufacturer-licensing provisions.

    Does not prove: The listing alone does not reveal the amendment text, its effect on alcohol regulation, whether it will pass, or whether manufacturer-licensing/public-record provisions would change.

  • undated Chuuk Code Title 29 §1009-1010EXCISE · B

    Chuuk imposes a beer/malt-beverage possession tax and provides that tax is due within five days after bottling or importation.

    Does not prove: The reference to bottling does not prove local brewing or bottling occurred.

Dominica · 3

  • 2007 Fiscal Incentives Act concession — 2007LICENSING · C

    Cabinet Decision No. 729 granted 15-year import-duty exemption on machinery/equipment/spares, 15-year income-tax exemption on profits, and withholding-tax waiver on foreign-loan interest.

  • 2015 Fiscal Incentives Act concession — raw/packaging materialsLICENSING · C

    DBBL received a 10-year exemption from import duty on raw and packaging materials.

  • 2015 Fiscal Incentives Act concession — laboratory/cleaning suppliesLICENSING · C

    DBBL received a five-year import-duty exemption on laboratory equipment and cleaning supplies.

Kosrae State · 3

  • 2023 KSC §13.517(7); L.B. 13-30 (2023)LICENSING · A

    Kosrae Bill 13-30 was signed into law in 2023 and reproduces §13.517 while retaining subsection (7), 'Manufacturing an alcoholic drink in the State.' Current 2026 official legislature indexing did not surface a later amendment to that subsection.

    Does not prove: Negative indexed searching does not prove no later law exists; authoritative 2026 continuity still requires a Chief Clerk/records-office check.

  • 2023 L.B. No. 13-30 / enacted August 25, 2023PROHIBITION · A

    The act amended §13.517(1) for Good Friday while reproducing the full section and retaining subsection (7), providing a modern enacted-text checkpoint for the manufacturing prohibition.

    Does not prove: Does not itself establish that subsection (7) remained untouched after August 2023.

  • undated State Law No. 11-121 / L.B. No. 11-54PROHIBITION · A

    The official 11th Legislature state-law index records S.L. 11-121 as amending Title 12 and §§13.516 and 13.517 to establish a drinking-permit requirement and related penalties, documenting the evolution of the same section that still contained the manufacturing prohibition in later enacted text.

    Does not prove: The index entry does not by itself establish the exact wording of every subsection after amendment or the enactment date.

Municipality of Esquel · 3

  • 2025 Hecho en Esquel local-production frameworkOTHER · A

    Includes locally made craft beer within the artisanal food-and-beverage category eligible for the local-production seal.

    Does not prove: Does not prove any specific producer holds the seal or currently brews.

  • 2025 Small-scale food production establishment regulationLABELLING · A

    Requires habilitation and labeling for small-scale local production establishments and regulates commercialization inside Esquel.

    Does not prove: The regulation itself does not identify brewery operators.

  • 2025 Resolución 1129/2025 – Construyendo Identidad alcohol authorizationEVENT_AUTHORIZATION · A

    Explicitly authorizes possession, exhibition and sale of alcoholic beverages from master brewers and locally produced artisan beverages at a municipal event.

    Does not prove: Does not identify which breweries participated and does not prove production by any named directory candidate.

New Brunswick · 3

  • undated New Brunswick Brewer's LicenceLICENSING · C

    A brewer's licence is required to manufacture beer commercially in New Brunswick; federal licensing is also required.

  • undated Regulation 2026-14 — removal of former in-house brewery licence referencesLICENSING · C

    Regulation 2026-14 removes references to the former in-house brewery licence category effective 1-Apr-2026.

  • undated Beneficial Ownership Register / individuals with significant controlOTHER · D

    NB corporations must internally maintain a register of individuals with significant control; 25%+ voting-share control is a threshold, but general public access is restricted.

Alberta · 2

  • undated AGLC Class E manufacturer licenceLICENSING · D

    AGLC says all Alberta liquor manufacturers need Class E; a brewer must have a permanent facility and cannot begin production until after final inspection/licensing.

  • undated AGLC contract manufacturing rulesLICENSING · D

    AGLC distinguishes manufacturer-to-manufacturer and manufacturer-to-agency contract production and states an agency owns the product in agency arrangements.

Barbados · 2

  • 1950 Brewery Act, Cap. 326LICENSING · A

    Official Attorney General index lists Brewery Act 1950-18, Cap. 326, as repealed by Act 2015-32. Historical text remains valuable for archival licensing research.

  • 2015 Excise Tax Act, 2015-32EXCISE · A

    Barbados Revenue Authority says the Act applies to beer and requires excise licensing, electronic registration, monthly returns, recordkeeping and compliance.

Federated States of Micronesia · 2

  • 1990 C.B. 6-296EXCISE · A

    Official congressional reporting says the bill would increase import taxes on beer and malt beverages upon establishment of a domestic brewery capable of producing beer reasonably available to the public.

    Does not prove: Does not prove the bill became law and does not prove a domestic brewery was established.

  • 2005 Public Law No. 13-60 / Title 54 §221EXCISE · A

    Public Law 13-60 set the national import duty for beer and malt beverages at $0.25 per 12 fluid ounces, documenting the later statutory tax regime after the 1990 domestic-brewery-linked proposal.

    Does not prove: Does not prove the legislative disposition of C.B. 6-296 and should not be used to infer that the earlier bill passed or failed.

Fiji · 2

  • 1957 Fiji Liquor Ordinance beer-access reformLICENSING · B

    Government proposal to relax race-based restrictions on purchasing/drinking beer, with implementation anticipated in 1958.

    Does not prove: Alcohol-law reform is context, not brewery-production proof. Exact enacted text/effective date should be checked against the primary ordinance if legal precision is required.

  • 1958 Beer without liquor permits for Fijian and Indian menLICENSING · A

    On 3 February 1958, Fijian and Indian males over 18 were reported drinking beer in Suva hotels without the former permit requirement.

    Does not prove: This contemporaneous report establishes implementation in practice; it does not substitute for the exact statutory amendment text or gazette citation.

Gilbert and Ellice Islands Colony · 2

  • 1916 Liquor Ordinance 1916 (No. 8 of 1916)LICENSING · A

    Official New Zealand legislation schedule identifies the Liquor Ordinance 1916, No. 8 of 1916, as a Gilbert and Ellice Islands ordinance.

  • 1964 New liquor legislation effective January 1964OTHER · A

    A January 1965 contemporary report says new liquor legislation came into force in January 1964 and reports changes in liquor-offence patterns.

Massachusetts · 2

  • undated M.G.L. c. 138, § 19CLICENSING · A

    State license permits malt beverage production and specified retail/wholesale sales.

  • undated M.G.L. c. 138, § 19DLICENSING · A

    State license authorizes malt beverage production and on-premise retail; separate Section 12 license required for serving.

Palau District, Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands · 2

  • 1950 Palau District Order No. 1-50PROHIBITION · A
  • 1956 Palau District Order No. 7-56OTHER · A

Red River Settlement / Council of Assiniboia · 2

  • undated Council of Assiniboia beer-sale restriction (13 June 1836)LICENSING · C

    Council minutes prohibited sale or traffic of beer to Indigenous people and imposed a twenty-shilling penalty.

  • undated Council of Assiniboia brewing/licensing framework (1860s)LICENSING · C

    MHS describes licensing requirements, eight-gallon home-use limit, restrictions on sale hours/premises and racially discriminatory alcohol rules.

Republic of Palau · 2

  • 2021 Executive Order 451DISTRIBUTION · A
  • undated Palau National Code Title 40 §1002LICENSING · A

Republic of the Marshall Islands · 2

  • 1994 Alcohol Restriction Act 1994LICENSING · A

    Context

  • undated Alcoholic Beverage Control Act 1971LICENSING · A

    Direct

San Marino · 2

  • 1871 Decree requiring manufacturing permissionOTHER · A

    A 1912 legal consultation states the decree required Consiglio Principe permission for manufacture of beer, pasta, soft drinks, alcoholic beverages and spirits.

  • 2010 Law No. 129 — public business license registerLICENSING · A

    Article 40 requires the Ufficio Industria, Artigianato e Commercio to maintain a public license register containing license holder, C.o.E., statistical code, activity seat, authorized activity, issue date, status and trade name.

San Marino / Italy · 2

  • 1897 Italy–San Marino convention, Article 37EXCISE · A

    The legal opinion reports that San Marino undertook to prevent production of goods subject to Italian internal manufacturing taxes from exceeding domestic needs and permitted export beyond Italy; this created a regulatory framework relevant to beer manufacturing.

  • 1907 Additional convention, Articles 5–6EXCISE · A

    The legal opinion states that the revenue-sharing calculation explicitly included manufacturing taxes on beer and that San Marino had to notify Italy if factories producing taxed goods were established in the Republic.

Sweden · 2

  • 2025 Farm/direct producer alcohol salesOTHER · A

    Direct producer sales allowed under municipal permit and paid visitor-arrangement conditions.

  • 2025 Reduced beer excise for independent small breweriesEXCISE · A

    Qualifying breweries up to 3 million L/year can receive reduced excise under independence and other criteria.

Vanuatu · 2

  • undated Liquor Licensing Act [CAP. 52]LICENSING · A

    Government-hosted consolidated act provides the statutory liquor-licensing framework.

  • undated Business Licence Act [CAP. 249] / business licensing procedureLICENSING · A

    Current Customs and Inland Revenue guidance identifies breweries as a specially documented business activity.

Alaska statewide · 1

  • 2022 Title 4 Rewrite enactedOTHER · C

    AMCO says law was modernized to create clearer, consistent framework for alcoholic beverage licensing/regulation.

Belize · 1

  • 1971 Brewery Act, Chapter 286EXCISE · A

    Defines and regulates breweries and beer under Belize law; provides the statutory context for brewery licences, excise controls and production regulation.

Canada · 1

  • undated NAICS Canada 2022 — 312120 BreweriesOTHER · D

    Defines breweries as establishments primarily engaged in brewing beer, ale, malt liquors and non-alcoholic beer; excludes purchased malt-beverage bottling and malt manufacturing.

El Salvador · 1

  • 2019 Ley Reguladora de la Producción y Comercialización del Alcohol y de las Bebidas AlcohólicasEXCISE · A

    Regulates operation, sanitary registrations, quality controls, taxes and consumer guarantees for beer and other alcoholic beverages.

Guatemala City · 1

  • 1856 Decree authorizing beer sales in beer businessesOTHER · B

    USAC research states a decree of October 3, 1856 authorized beer sales in beer businesses after the Bertholin business opened.

    Does not prove: Legal authorization does not prove all licensed businesses brewed on site.

Inuvik, Northwest Territories · 1

  • undated Town of Inuvik Brewery and Distillery zoning useZONING · C

    2025 zoning update defines a Brewery and Distillery use and requires brewery/distillery development applications to document water needs/source.

Italy · 1

  • 2016 Legge 28 luglio 2016, n. 154 — Art. 35OTHER · A

Japan / South Seas mandate · 1

  • 1939 Imperial Decree No. 789 — 米穀搗精等制限令OTHER · A

Koror · 1

  • 1961 Municipal Ordinance No. 20-61LICENSING · A

Koror State · 1

  • 1997 KSPL No. K5-78-97OTHER · A

Palau Branch / South Seas Government · 1

  • 1939 Palau Branch beer price-control notices (1939–1941; notices referenced/updated in official gazette)OTHER · B

Palau Congress · 1

  • 1955 Palau Congress Resolution No. 10-55DISTRIBUTION · A

Palau Liquor Control Board · 1

  • 1958 Liquor Control Board Regulation No. 3LICENSING · A

South Seas Government · 1

  • 1939 South Seas Government Ordinance No. 68 — 米穀搗精等制限規則LICENSING · B

Trust Territory / Marshall Islands District · 1

  • undated Marshall Islands District beer import/sales controlsEXCISE · A

    Direct

What this page cannot tell you

  • Which brewery each law touched. The archive mints no brewery-to-law link until a research row names both, and no row has yet. Alabama's eight laws shaped every Alabama brewery in the archive and are connected to none of them.
  • The big jurisdictions. 39 jurisdictions of the 84 laws, and Germany, the United Kingdom, Belgium, Ontario and California are not among them — the researched leads mention strength caps and container limits most in California, Canada, the UK and Germany, which is exactly where the next `laws.csv` should come from.
  • The Reinheitsgebot. Read as economics rather than purity in its own Take; it is not yet a row in the law layer.

A master that carries a `laws.csv` — act, jurisdiction, date in force, what it did, the breweries it named — lands here with no code change. Tell the archive about the law that shaped your beer.

Method: laws are rows in the archive's law layer with their own sources and grades; the four questions group them by recorded type; quoted lines are the record's relevance or what-it-proves field. Figures regenerate with every build.